Am I the only one who doesn't agree with this? So many (probably the majority) of the people who are against these people speaking at Bentleyville cited reasons involving kids; they didn't want to make them uncomfortable, or have to explain what they were saying to their kids, and they didn't want any of the overall joy of the Bentleyville experience to be taken away. So ... you want to explain what a sex offender is to your child instead? You think this somehow adds to the joyful, loving, family friendly spirit of Bentleyville??? I'm sorry, but Bentleyville is not the place for this type of public persecution, just as it is not the place for their religious speeches either. Two wrongs do not make a right.

You really think he's going to try to touch your children at Bentlyville? Just don't let your kids go near him. There could be any number of other people there that are sex offenders and you would never know it, (unless you're going to go find them and follow them around with signs as well) so logic says getting this one guy out doesn't necessarily reduce whatever risk you think is involved. I agree that the guy is annoying and unpleasant, I agree sexual predation is disgusting, I just don't agree that this sign does anything positive to help the situation. I may be alone in the belief that public persecution in front of children is not the way to go. That's fine, I won't be changing my mind.