Duluth concert tickets — Buy Local?

I propose that the city of Duluth only issue event licenses under the condition that tickets must be purchasable locally. For example, do I really have to pay Ticketmaster $11.37 in handling fees for a $35 concert ticket at Bayfront Festival Park this summer? A 32 percent markup paid to a California company? I would much rather pay any ticket markup to a local record store or nonprofit. Or, directly to the city for that matter. Anything to keep the money in our community, not exporting it to a corporation in California. Maybe I am missing something?

27 Comments

  1. Danny G on April 16, 2011 at 5:02 pm

    This would lead to even fewer shows in Duluth. Sad, but true.

  2. Vicarious on April 16, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    Danny, please elaborate.

  3. in.dog.neato on April 16, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    The terrorists would win.

  4. Need on April 16, 2011 at 6:11 pm

    Sounds like you’re missing the show.

  5. Paul Lundgren on April 16, 2011 at 6:13 pm

    Vicarious asked Danny G to elaborate. That’s got to be unprecedented.

    I think we’re not far from seeing either serious changes in Ticketmaster’s tactics or other online ticket outlets taking over. Give it a year and watch what happens.

  6. Vicarious on April 16, 2011 at 6:18 pm

    I’m on the cutting edge.

  7. in.dog.neato on April 16, 2011 at 6:40 pm

    Cutting edge of pants!

  8. Danny G on April 16, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    This is not coming from any expertise or anything on my end, but here’s what I was sort of going for. Let’s say you’re a promoter for an Elton John or a Willie Nelson (or Korn, Alice Cooper,etc.). Now let’s say you’re putting a tour together. Part of that process would involve securing ticket distribution. Ticketmaster is going to be given the list of the cities on the tour. Now let’s say at one small, northern MN hamlet on that tour the promoter says “by the way, TM…you guys don’t get to do our tickets there…just everywhere else”. I doubt that’s going to fly with them.

  9. Craig S. on April 16, 2011 at 7:03 pm

    I’m no fan of TM, but the ticketing industry AND the live entertainment industry are far more complicated than simply requiring tickets to be sold “locally.”

    Without getting into lots of detail, bear in mind these acts are national acts that like consistency in distribution. Every artist contract I have read requires a bonded ticketing agency.

    You could probably devote an entire website to ticketing “101.”

    Is it a racket? Sure. And yes, Paul is probably right, things will change in the next year. Will convenience charges and facility fees ever go away? Doubtful. They may come down, but someone will pay for the convenience of sitting at home in their pj’s, coffee and buying tickets online.

    Again, I do not defend Ticketmaster. They make a lot if money on someone else’s back.

  10. peaceNic on April 17, 2011 at 5:28 am

    Local acts are cheaper, more intimate, and the money stays here.

  11. mrashley on April 17, 2011 at 5:47 am

    Pearl Jam and others tried to take this on in the 1990s and failed. But it does work when I can buy tickets safely and with confidence for shows across the country and in Europe when I go on holiday. I think I would be happy if they just started calling the extra charges our profit.

  12. Jesus on April 17, 2011 at 6:02 am

    Ticketmaster is run by the devil … bastard.

  13. patty on April 17, 2011 at 10:46 am

    While we’re on the subject of concert tickets, we should all be writting our St. Paul reps. and the Governor asking them to repeal the law that was passed just a few years ago and made scalping legal in MN. What’s the point of that? Where is the benefit in allowing people to make thousands of dollars off the work and talent of others? In the end, the consumer loses as well as anyone else legitimately involved in these concerts.

  14. Rougement on April 17, 2011 at 11:06 am

    Two of my biggest pet hates are monopolies and being ripped off, so I don’t so business with Ticketmaster. It means I miss out on shows but I can live with that.

    It’s easy to blame TM but they’re a huge corporation doing what huge corporations do. If the punters and the artists got organized against TM it would be to everyone’s benefit but I don’t see it happening anytime soon. That would be terribly inconvenient when you can just pay the convenience charge and grumble about it.

  15. Claire on April 17, 2011 at 11:08 am

    Agree with Patty. That law makes no sense.

  16. Craig R on April 17, 2011 at 1:36 pm

    Then somebody please explain why the local roller derby uses Ticketmaster.

  17. MJ on April 17, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    First Avenue managed to dump Ticketmaster. Thanks to the Internet, it’s certainly possible these days, and I hope and expect that more venues will soon follow suit.

  18. Shane Bauer on April 17, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    This looks like a sweet spot to let everyone know that we were able to do our own ticketing through our own, local business for Michael Franti & Spearhead on July 9 (Twin Ports Bridge Festival), despite a contract that requested a bonded ticketing agency.

    There’s no way we could have comfortably promoted a positive, community event through TicketMaster. So there’s a $4 “everything” charge for shipping, handling, convenience, facility, processing, whatever-they-try-to-call-it charges.

    That says a lot of good things about the band, the agency representing them, and the future of event ticketing. I think.

  19. @ndy on April 17, 2011 at 4:40 pm

    I second MJ’s sentiments. If First Ave can drop ticketmaster, there’s no reason local venues and Secret Service can’t drop them as well.

  20. Mr. Digits on April 18, 2011 at 4:33 am

    Incidentally, Patty, the question “where is the benefit in allowing people to make thousands of dollars off the work and talent of others?” is pretty much the basis of communism.

    I’m not saying it isn’t a great question, though, so if anybody knows…

  21. patty on April 18, 2011 at 7:37 am

    Mr. Digits, sir… I don’t really think Communism is based on stealing the talents of others and making a profit. In fact, although I’m not an expert, it would seem that an individual making a profit runs counter to basic Communist principles. Sharing the wealth economic models are not the same thing as scapling concert tickets. Just the opposite, in fact. Capitalism loves a profit, and doesn’t always require an ethical route to making one… Just sayin’!

  22. girlfromnorthcountry on April 18, 2011 at 9:13 am

    @Craig R, the DECC will only allow ticket sales through Ticketmaster, otherwise it would be Brown Paper Tickets all the way. Which we’ve used at the Wessman and World of Wheels.

  23. woodtick on April 18, 2011 at 10:45 am

    And the Devil wears a flag pin.

  24. john on April 18, 2011 at 11:11 am

    The folks putting on the Michael Franti gig successfully circumvented Ticketbastard – fwiw.

  25. Mr. Digits on April 18, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    Patty, what I was basically saying is that capitalism is based on stealing the profit’s (or excess capital, as it were) from those who create it, and that Ticketmaster pretty much exemplifies it.

    Perhaps you assumed that I was accusing you of something? False. I know that people use “socialist/communist” as a bad word or name, and generally incorrectly at that, but I wasn’t using it there. Nor am I at all “conservative” myself.

    In other words, mellow out.

  26. ruby2sd4y on April 22, 2011 at 9:40 pm

    This (ticketing rape via ticketmasturbators – strokin it all for their own glory) hasn’t changed in the last year or several – what makes you think it would all change within the next one?

  27. Paul Lundgren on April 23, 2011 at 7:20 am

    It won’t all change; it will start to change. See Shane Bauer’s comment.

Leave a Comment





The maximum upload file size: 1 MB. You can upload: image, audio. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here