And of course the term “tar sands” is avoided. And they will also be piping the oil fracked in North Dakota. And once the oil gets to Superior, someone is actually thinking of shipping it across the big lake. But, hey, it’s only 10 percent of the earth’s fresh water that will be endangered, no big deal.
Why don’t they just keep building the pipe through Superior, around the big lake to the destination, thus cutting down on the carbon emissions that are “causing” global warming?
And of course the term “tar sands” is avoided. And they will also be piping the oil fracked in North Dakota. And once the oil gets to Superior, someone is actually thinking of shipping it across the big lake. But, hey, it’s only 10 percent of the earth’s fresh water that will be endangered, no big deal.
Why don’t they just keep building the pipe through Superior, around the big lake to the destination, thus cutting down on the carbon emissions that are “causing” global warming?