I'm with you adam, there seems to be a disconnect among some people about what this actually means for residents of the Kozy. Do you think they would be living above the Kozy if there were a lot of options available to them? And those who think it's a blessing in disguise that this "blemish" will be gone from Duluth should try walking a minute in someone else's shoes. Or try to find low-income housing in said shoes.

I don't dig the digs of the DNT just for the sake of knocking them down, adam.

Adam, does your criticism of the headline have to do with the word "shelter," as opposed to another, less-loaded-in-this-context word? 

I thought the article was well-written, respectfully-reported, the reporters actually talked to a lot of people to present a pretty clear picture of the challenges these displaced persons have to deal with. I am gratified there doesn't seem to be the usual over-the-top sensationalism with this ongoing story that we've come to expect from the DNT.

"Shelter," yes. Again, maybe it's just me.

Adam could be a little more clear about what he's talking about.  The story talks about people who will be needing long-term shelter.  You can say shelter is a loaded term, but some of the stereotypes might fit here considering even Ringsred has come out and said that without him many of those people would be on the street.  So in a sense, he is providing "shelter" in the loaded sense of the word.  However, to go so far as to call "shelter" in the headline an obvious sign of bias/slanting is a stretch at best.