How many of me?
IT'S WORKING! IT'S WORKING!
It's not as much fun as googleing & reading about the Michelle Rowleys of the world, but now I know there are less than 50 of us in the US. However, there are 0 purples, so perhaps I should just make a legal name change.
Comments
There's only one person with my name? I find that hard to believe...
Posted by: Bad Cat! | October 12, 2006 07:27 AM
You brought the site down Purple.
Posted by: starfire | October 12, 2006 07:47 AM
Damn. Michelle Rowleys are trouble.
Posted by: Purple | October 12, 2006 07:52 AM
Ya, looks like it's slashdotted--way to go, Purple.
Posted by: adam | October 12, 2006 05:02 PM
Only one of me, but I've known this forever. Easy when the military muffs up you're family last name during WWII, and it is just more convient for you granfather to just use the errored one then to get eveyrthing fixed. Right now only 14 people live with my last name, and I know there are no repeats.
Posted by: Sjixxxy | October 12, 2006 10:09 PM
Also only one
Posted by: Netland Jr. | October 14, 2006 01:11 PM
Yep, I'm the only person with my name, too.
Posted by: Mary | October 14, 2006 07:01 PM
Strangely, there are only 934 people with my name, as common as both my first and last names are.
Posted by: ironic1 | October 16, 2006 12:09 PM
More disturbing, though, is that apparently there are 0 people in the US with the names of my son or daughter. Wonder what database they are using?
Posted by: ironic1 | October 16, 2006 12:11 PM
I have common name so a couple hundred thou share mine.
Interestingly I entered my sister's name and it showed no one shared hers. She is under the radar of life! Hee
Posted by: heysme | October 16, 2006 03:22 PM
"Statistically the 143rd most popular first name"--woot! In your face!
"99.62 percent of people with the first name Adam are male."
Posted by: adam | October 18, 2006 12:55 PM