Garbage is as garbage does, I like to say once.

With regard Dugglass's comments, as his brother-in-law if the law were common, I should like to expose him for the giggler that he is.  I should like to expose him, but no one wants to see that.  Truth is, his gigglings range far and wide and are not as rare as he would lead you or god or Martin Landau's second cousin to believe.  

This is not to say that his gigglings aren't worth a damn - oh no, far from it, people!  They are worth at least a damn, possibly more, considering today's market fluctuations. That is to say, view his giggling admissions with skepticism, yet accept them at face value.  That's all I'm trying to say or not.

In closing, I'd like to say that I enjoyed the podcast very much which of course is a subjective level of enjoyment that you couldn't possibly reckon with but be assured that it is a "good" level of enjoyment and while that level is also subjective we can all come to a cultural consensus with regard to the word itself because we say things like "good" beer, "good" pizza, "good" music, etc. -- phrases that indicate some nebulous yet substantive (by degree) level of enjoyment which is what I said in the first place (or second -- I can't remember).

In any case, rock on you crazy, crazy persons!