Perfect Duluth Day | Duluth News Events Music and More
Google+


Duluth concert tickets — Buy Local?

I propose that the City only issue event licenses under the condition that tickets must be purchasable locally. For example, do I really have to pay Ticketmaster $11.37 in handling fees for a $35 concert ticket at Bayfront Festival Park this summer? A 32% markup paid to a California company? I would much rather pay any ticket markup to a local record store or nonprofit. Or, directly to the City for that matter. Anything to keep the money in our community, not exporting it to a corporation in California. Maybe I am missing something?

27 Comment(s)

  1. This would lead to even fewer shows in Duluth. Sad, but true.

    Danny G | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  2. Danny, please elaborate.

    Vicarious | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  3. The terrorists would win.

    in.dog.neato | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  4. Sounds like you’re missing the show.

    Need | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  5. Vicarious asked Danny G to elaborate. That’s got to be unprecedented.

    I think we’re not far from seeing either serious changes in Ticketmaster’s tactics or other online ticket outlets taking over. Give it a year and watch what happens.

    Paul Lundgren | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  6. I’m on the cutting edge.

    Vicarious | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  7. Cutting edge of pants!

    in.dog.neato | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  8. This is not coming from any expertise or anything on my end, but here’s what I was sort of going for. Let’s say you’re a promoter for an Elton John or a Willie Nelson (or Korn, Alice Cooper,etc.). Now let’s say you’re putting a tour together. Part of that process would involve securing ticket distribution. Ticketmaster is going to be given the list of the cities on the tour. Now let’s say at one small, northern MN hamlet on that tour the promoter says “by the way, TM…you guys don’t get to do our tickets there…just everywhere else”. I doubt that’s going to fly with them.

    Danny G | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  9. I’m no fan of TM, but the ticketing industry AND the live entertainment industry are far more complicated than simply requiring tickets to be sold “locally.”

    Without getting into lots of detail, bear in mind these acts are national acts that like consistency in distribution. Every artist contract I have read requires a bonded ticketing agency.

    You could probably devote an entire website to ticketing “101.”

    Is it a racket? Sure. And yes, Paul is probably right, things will change in the next year. Will convenience charges and facility fees ever go away? Doubtful. They may come down, but someone will pay for the convenience of sitting at home in their pj’s, coffee and buying tickets online.

    Again, I do not defend Ticketmaster. They make a lot if money on someone else’s back.

    Craig S. | Apr 16, 2011 | New Comment
  10. Local acts are cheaper, more intimate, and the money stays here.

    peaceNic | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  11. Pearl Jam and others tried to take this on in the 1990s and failed. But it does work when I can buy tickets safely and with confidence for shows across the country and in Europe when I go on holiday. I think I would be happy if they just started calling the extra charges our profit.

    mrashley | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  12. Ticketmaster is run by the devil … bastard.

    Jesus | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  13. While we’re on the subject of concert tickets, we should all be writting our St. Paul reps. and the Governor asking them to repeal the law that was passed just a few years ago and made scalping legal in MN. What’s the point of that? Where is the benefit in allowing people to make thousands of dollars off the work and talent of others? In the end, the consumer loses as well as anyone else legitimately involved in these concerts.

    patty | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  14. Two of my biggest pet hates are monopolies and being ripped off, so I don’t so business with Ticketmaster. It means I miss out on shows but I can live with that.

    It’s easy to blame TM but they’re a huge corporation doing what huge corporations do. If the punters and the artists got organized against TM it would be to everyone’s benefit but I don’t see it happening anytime soon. That would be terribly inconvenient when you can just pay the convenience charge and grumble about it.

    Rougement | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  15. Agree with Patty. That law makes no sense.

    Claire | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  16. Then somebody please explain why the local roller derby uses Ticketmaster.

    Craig R | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  17. First Avenue managed to dump Ticketmaster. Thanks to the Internet, it’s certainly possible these days, and I hope and expect that more venues will soon follow suit.

    MJ | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  18. This looks like a sweet spot to let everyone know that we were able to do our own ticketing through our own, local business for Michael Franti & Spearhead on July 9 (Twin Ports Bridge Festival), despite a contract that requested a bonded ticketing agency.

    There’s no way we could have comfortably promoted a positive, community event through TicketMaster. So there’s a $4 “everything” charge for shipping, handling, convenience, facility, processing, whatever-they-try-to-call-it charges.

    That says a lot of good things about the band, the agency representing them, and the future of event ticketing. I think.

    Shane Bauer | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  19. I second MJ’s sentiments. If First Ave can drop ticketmaster, there’s no reason local venues and Secret Service can’t drop them as well.

    @ndy | Apr 17, 2011 | New Comment
  20. Incidentally, Patty, the question “where is the benefit in allowing people to make thousands of dollars off the work and talent of others?” is pretty much the basis of communism.

    I’m not saying it isn’t a great question, though, so if anybody knows…

    Mr. Digits | Apr 18, 2011 | New Comment
  21. Mr. Digits, sir… I don’t really think Communism is based on stealing the talents of others and making a profit. In fact, although I’m not an expert, it would seem that an individual making a profit runs counter to basic Communist principles. Sharing the wealth economic models are not the same thing as scapling concert tickets. Just the opposite, in fact. Capitalism loves a profit, and doesn’t always require an ethical route to making one… Just sayin’!

    patty | Apr 18, 2011 | New Comment
  22. @Craig R, the DECC will only allow ticket sales through Ticketmaster, otherwise it would be Brown Paper Tickets all the way. Which we’ve used at the Wessman and World of Wheels.

    girlfromnorthcountry | Apr 18, 2011 | New Comment
  23. And the Devil wears a flag pin.

    woodtick | Apr 18, 2011 | New Comment
  24. The folks putting on the Michael Franti gig successfully circumvented Ticketbastard -- fwiw.

    john | Apr 18, 2011 | New Comment
  25. Patty, what I was basically saying is that capitalism is based on stealing the profit’s (or excess capital, as it were) from those who create it, and that Ticketmaster pretty much exemplifies it.

    Perhaps you assumed that I was accusing you of something? False. I know that people use “socialist/communist” as a bad word or name, and generally incorrectly at that, but I wasn’t using it there. Nor am I at all “conservative” myself.

    In other words, mellow out.

    Mr. Digits | Apr 18, 2011 | New Comment
  26. This (ticketing rape via ticketmasturbators -- strokin it all for their own glory) hasn’t changed in the last year or several -- what makes you think it would all change within the next one?

    ruby2sd4y | Apr 22, 2011 | New Comment
  27. It won’t all change; it will start to change. See Shane Bauer’s comment.

    Paul Lundgren | Apr 23, 2011 | New Comment

Post a Comment
Subscribe To Comments RSS

You must be logged in to post a comment.